What’s Your Favorite Building?

Everyone has a house or building they love for reasons that are better felt than described.  These are inspired structures that make our lives and communities better simply by them being in them.  You probably can’t name who designed them.

In many cases, they may have been built and rebuilt over the years until they achieved a rambling organic look that is almost impossible to reproduce.  Others may be solid and unchanging testaments to one person’s taste.

What are some of your favorites?  Snap a picture next time you see one and share it here.  Tell us why you like it and we’ll tell you what we think.

Balance vs. Symmetry

There is a big difference between symmetry and balance. The Taj Mahal in India, for example, is perfectly symmetrical. Its left side is the exact duplicate of its right side. And while this makes for a beautiful building, it’s not very practical. You can’t change anything to accommodate new uses without ruining the entire structure.

In real life, families grow and change.  So do companies and congregations. The buildings they occupy need to be able to grow and change with them. This doesn’t mean a building can’t still be beautiful as it adapts to new uses.  In fact, some of the best buildings are those that seem to ramble on an unplanned and almost organic way.

The key is balance. A building that is asymmetrical can achieve enormous power and beauty by its composition and the interplay between its parts.

A typical New England farmhouse, for example, has four sections that were built over time as the farmer prospered: a main living area, a separate kitchen, a stable and a barn all connected to each other. This formula is sometmes known as “big house, little house, back house, barn” and it results in some startlingly beautiful compositions.

We incorporate balance and composition into all of our work because that’s the best way to get create homes, offices and churches that are beuatiful as well as practical and adaptive.

Symmetry is great but it rarely stands the test of time. Unless it’s the Taj Mahal.

Does Geothermal Make Sense in New England?

Right about now the typical homeowner in the Northeast is praying for spring not just because the change in season is overdue but also because the crushing cost of home heating oil is about as much as anyone can bear. There must be cheaper ways to heat a house – a small nuclear reactor perhaps?

One possibility is geothermal with a heat pump. Geothermal heating uses the constant temperature of the earth to supply heat in the winter and air conditioning in the summer.

After an upfront investment in a closed loop well the system runs only on the electricity needed for a standard heat pump. The savings over an oil burner-based system are significant . . . even in cold climates like New England. According to some, the typical geothermal system is about three times as efficient as a conventional system. And there’s a bonus – geothermal provides cool air as well as hot. It’s an air conditioning system at no extra charge.

Geothermal heating works best with a radiant heating system built into the floors of a building. The circulating warm water delivers an even and uniquely pleasing heat on the feet. So for new construction, geothermal is a reasonable option.

But in some older houses radiant heat is not an option and geothermal is not adaptable to warm water baseboard radiators witch demand a higher temperature than geothermal can produce. In that case, geothermal heat is delivered through forced air and ductwork. It’s still cheaper than oil per BTU but not as comfortable as the older radiators.

We’ve worked with geothermal and we’re looking to incorporate it in future projects. If you want to find out if it’s right for you, we’re always happy to discuss the pros and cons.

Until then, here’s a little video that explains the process visually: http://youtu.be/NBHHqw6TRXk

The Architect’s Blog

I’m discovering that blogging is harder than it seems. What could be so hard about writing a few lines every couple of days about a profession with seemingly endless topics? Is it that many of the topics I consider would only be interesting to other architects?

It certainly seems to be a theme in our profession. Just speak or write a bunch of big words that no one has the slightest idea what you are talking about and you may just be considered an architectural expert. Case in point, I was reading a “crit” by a Columbia University Professor in Architecture Magazine the other day and realized that Architects really just enjoy talking to other Architects. Who else could possibly understand (maybe I should say, “want” to understand) the following excerpt regarding a new addition to Milstein Hall at Columbia designed by OMA.

“It is to experience something of a heteropticon or peripateticon, in which moving eyes and feet on nearby bridge and stair and elevator all offer felicitous encounter and interrupting incident.”

What? Maybe I’m not even an Architect because I struggle to understand this. Actually I had to look up a couple of the words in the dictionary! So as I continue my quest to conquer the blogosphere, I remain committed in my search for ideas to write about and I promise to avoid words which require a dictionary for interpretation.

Hmmm, that makes me think, maybe I should consider discussing my maturation of an architectural pedagogy…………

paper mache octopus in ocean

Charlie and the Purple Piñata

The other day my 8 year old son came home from school with the idea to make a piñata. Since it wasn’t his birthday, nor anyone else’s I could think of in the neighborhood and knowing that he isn’t necessarily the “arts and crafts” kind of kid, I asked him, Why? His answer was short and sweet. I can smash it and it’s full of candy. Ahhhh yes, destruction and candy, my 8 year old’s Holy Grail.

So began the weeklong after-dinner project of constructing a piñata. All said and done, building a piñata is fairly simple and a fun thing to do with your children. We simply blew up a balloon and started the paper-mache process of flour, water and newspaper strips. Tip #1: Use a plaster or glue mix to give the piñata additional strength. After four layers of newspaper strips, our paper-mache looked like a big egg, of course this was the point at which my son explained he was interested in making a snake piñata! Tip #2: Decide on what you are making first, and then use the appropriate balloon or cardboard to shape your paper-mache creation. After lengthy discussions it was decided that we would make an octopus. With brown, purple and blue crepe paper in hand, the decorating and designing commenced. Tip #3: Consider your strategy for filling the piñata with candy, and how to close it up prior to decorating. Once decorated, we realized that the hole to fill the piñata was on the bottom of the octopus head rather than the top. The solution for this gravity challenge would have to be accomplished with the design of the tentacles. We cut the leg shapes (8 in total) out of foam core, decorated them and glued them together in an “X” arrangement which allowed for a 3” diameter foam core plug to be glued at the top of the “X”. Using picture wire we basically sewed the plug and accompanying octopus legs to the paper-mache head. Tip #4: Do not use picture wire. 

 The day of reckoning had finally come. With a crowd of young neighborhood kids, a plastic yellow wiffle bat and a red bandana, the piñata was hoisted over the basketball hoop. Evidently, my son had spent the week making the proper negotiations amongst his neighboring friends to have first the first “cut” at the purple octopus piñata. With the anticipation growing, blindfold in place and bat at the ready, the piñata was put in motion. I’m not sure that there could have been a more anti-climatic ending if we had planned it. The picture wire used to make a loop for the rope at the top of the piñata, combined with the weight of five bags of candy, combined with sudden pulling on the rope, combined with gravity, essentially created instant piñata failure. Tip #5: Did I mention “do not use picture wire”? Wire cuts paper-mache like a hot knife through butter.

While the piñata was never struck, the driveway did the job perfectly, splitting the octopus head and delivering its candy payload to happy children. Next time (because I’ve been informed “we need to do this again!”) there will be a little better planning and some strategic design and material revisions!

ridgefield library morris building

The Public Library: The True Barometer of a Community’s Core Values

As chairman of the Ridgefield Library Board, I find myself repeatedly challenged to defend the need for a public library in the modern information era. It’s always the same argument, “computers, the internet, the Kindle, etc. will replace or significantly reduce the need for a physical location”, Read more

green hummer

Don’t Try to “Greenwash” Me

We have all heard the popular eco-jargon.  Every day we see or hear “green” -this and “eco-friendly”-that. As architects, we see many new building products and hear from many salespeople, all cheerleading the supposed “green-ness” of their goods.  Read more

peter, john and staff reviewing plans

Coordination is King

[image title=”Team1″ size=”full” id=”98″ align=”none” ]
Have you ever been involved with a construction project that is constantly hindered with little ticky-tacky problems?  A beautiful wainscot trim cut around a light switch? An HVAC register located where a chandelier was intended to be centered? Read more

icicles forming on roof

How to take the “Damn!” out of Ice Dams

Winter is fast approaching and one of the most annoying (and sometimes extremely expensive) maintenance issues for homeowners is those pesky ice dams. You know, the pretty icicles that build up on the eaves and overhangs of your house. Read more